Skip to content
TruPriv
DPDP Act, 2023 · DPDP Rules, 2025

DPDP compliance software that turns every consent into evidence.

Compliance is not the product.Evidence of compliance is.

Any tool can record a consent. The hard part is proving, on demand, that a specific consent was validly obtained, for a specific purpose, at a specific time, and honoured throughout its life. Sec 6(10) puts that burden of proof on the Data Fiduciary. TruPriv exists to discharge it.

What is TruPriv?

TruPriv is DPDP compliance software for Indian businesses. Four modules, Consent Management, Cookie Management, Data Governance and Privacy Governance, run together or standalone. Every consent is stored as a versioned, hash-chained record, so you can show that notice was given and consent obtained, which Sec 6(10) of the DPDP Act, 2023 requires you to prove. TruPriv is not a registered Consent Manager.

Privacy you can prove.

Where the law applies

Built for India's DPDP Act, 2023 and DPDP Rules, 2025

Data protection law is territorial.

A platform designed around one statute carries that statute's assumptions in its data model, its vocabulary and its defaults.

India wrote its own.

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and the DPDP Rules, 2025. Not a translation of anything, and not a dialect of the GDPR.

TruPriv was built here.

Consent-centric processing, the Consent Manager construct, notice in Eighth Schedule languages, and a burden of proof that sits on the Data Fiduciary.

Act 22 of 2023Jurisdiction of the Data Protection Board

An outline of India, marking the territory the DPDP Act, 2023 applies to. It is a stylised emblem rather than a survey map and is not to scale.

The object

Proof of consent under Sec 6(10): records that cannot be quietly rewritten.

An artefact carries who consented, to which purposes, when, by what method, under which notice version and in which language, with a signature over all of it. Change anything and you get a new version; the old one stays retrievable.

Each write is hashed and chained to the one before it, so a record cannot be altered after the fact without breaking the chain. That is what makes the log evidence rather than a list. Sec 6(10)

Versioned
Never overwritten
Chained
Hash links every write
Exportable
As a file, on demand
Attributable
Notice version and language
Consent artefactv3 · current
principal_id
dp_9f2c41ab
purpose_ids
billing.invoice · support.contact
timestamp
2027-05-14T11:04:19+05:30
capture_method
web · affirmative · default-deny
notice_version
v4.2 · en-IN, hi-IN, ta-IN
signature
sha256:8b41…c7d0

Prior versions remain retrievable. Every write is hash-chained to the one before it.

The validation gate

Consent validation API: four checks before any processing.

The Data Fiduciary calls the validation API before it processes. If any one of the four conditions fails, the gate refuses and the processing does not happen. It fails closed: silence is a refusal, not an approval. Sec 6(10)

Flip any condition to see what the gate does. This is an illustration of the specified behaviour, not a live API.

Processing request
Exists✓ Pass
Active✓ Pass
Not expired✓ Pass
In scope✓ Pass
✓ Processing permitted
Permitted · processing may proceed
The platform

Consent management, cookie consent, data governance and privacy governance in one platform.

Each module also runs standalone. Start with the one where you are most exposed. Onboarding data is shared across the suite, so adding the next one is configuration rather than a fresh implementation.

Why India-native

Built for the DPDP Act, not adapted from the GDPR.

A platform designed around a different statute carries that statute's assumptions. The DPDP Act's notice requirements, its Eighth Schedule language obligations, its Consent Manager architecture and its burden of proof are specific, and a retrofit shows.

Even companies that have bought a global privacy platform have not solved consent.

Notice in Eighth Schedule languages
Served in English plus Eighth Schedule languages, with the language shown recorded on the artefact. Sec 5(3) and 6(3).
Withdrawal as easy as giving
Real-time halt, downstream processors instructed to cease, and an acknowledgement required back from each of them. Sec 6(4).
Burden of proof discharged
Every action writes to a tamper-evident, immutable audit log with cryptographic hashing. Sec 6(10).
No per-language fees
Annual contracts, and every Eighth Schedule language is included in every tier. Serving more of them should not cost you more.

The substantive obligations come into force on 13 May 2027.

The Rules were notified, and the Act's Data Protection Board provisions came into force, on 13 November 2025 (G.S.R. 843(E)). Consent Manager provisions Sec 6(9) commence on 13 November 2026. Penalties up to ₹250 crore attach to a failure to take reasonable security safeguards. Sec 8(5)

Time to full enforcement ·

187 days to 13 May 2027, when the DPDP Act's substantive obligations come into force.

Early Access Partner Programme

Five foundational places are open. Partners shape the roadmap, get the founders on their implementation, and keep preferential terms into general availability.